"not over the horrible night of paramilitary" Iván Cepeda *
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Itunes Wont Let Me Drag Music Into My Ipod
"BACRIM GANGS ARE NOT CRIMINALS OR SMALL SELF"
"not over the horrible night of paramilitary" Iván Cepeda *
* The Chamber representative requested the national government to withdraw from the sections of the National Development Plan that defines the characterization "not over the horrible night of paramilitary" Iván Cepeda *
bands BACRIM heirs of paramilitary activity, and to recognize the continuity paramilitary groups in Colombia .* BOGOTA, March 23 / 10. During the discussion of political control and continuity false
demobilization of paramilitary and para-politics,
held in the House of Representatives, Congressman
Democratic Pole, Ivan caped, said the bands called BACRIM
government, are not merely gangs, but they are powerful structures
gave continuity to the horror of paramilitaries in Colombia
.
* "are not simply the BACRIM bands are not gangs, not small offenders, not just some groups that are fighting for a few
pesos. Mr. Minister, this is not over the horrible night
paramilitary "Cepeda said .* Thus the assertion of the Minister of Defense Rodrigo Rivera
, BACRIM that have nothing to do with the paramilitaries and
are merely common criminals.
The representative asked the Government to remove the characterization of BACRIM
included in the National Development Plan and
recognize that what occurred was a transfer of power between paramilitaries,
maintaining a powerful criminal structure that is growing.
noted that under international law, these groups meet the characteristics
an armed group: they have a hierarchical structure
exert territorial control, and maintain close links with members
forces or in the areas of power.
Cepeda said that in Colombia there is an old and a new
paramilitary paramilitary structure, and in that sense, he wondered about the lack of definition
in proceedings against
emerald czar Victor Carranza, on charges of formation of paramilitary groups,
massacres, forced disappearance, among others. He recalled that
Carranza has only once been in jail for one of these crimes but
not know what happened to the others, when there are strong indications that this employer
has been committed. However
Congress recognized that the Attorney General
has opened a new investigation against Victor Carranza, given the multiple statements
paramilitary chiefs
mark him as leader and contributor in the formation of such groups. Iván Cepeda
also referred to the serious phenomenon of the heirs of the
parapolitics or paramilitary political front men that would
giving the Congress and demanded justice promote a
exemplary punishment to those who benefited and brains were
parapolitics in the country. Called for strengthening prosecution and the judicial branch
purpose.
-
Yepes Lina Maria Giraldo
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Licencing A Homemade Trailer In Ontario
FORWARD CHAMBER OF CONTROL POLICY DEBATE ON FALSE demobilized paramilitaries AND CONTINUITY IN COLOMBIA IVAN CEPEDA
The plenary of the House of Representatives approved a proposal from representatives Guillermo Rivera, Liberal Party, and Iván Cepeda Castro del Polo Democrático, to carry out a control debate policy on allegations of false demobilization of armed groups, and on the continuation of paramilitary activity in the country and parapolitics within Congress.
For the representative Ivan Cepeda, the paramilitaries in Colombia is still alive and strengthened in the groups that the government has called BACRIM criminal gangs, or emerging bands.
"A paramilitary structures that exist today in many parts of Colombia did not can be treated like a common criminal gangs simple," said Cepeda.
According to the congressman, the State does not deny the victims the money for repair, while the treasury has squandered on false demobilizations.
"While the government cheapens the cost of victims law, the country wondered how much it has cost the state demobilization and reintegration false," he said.
Iván Cepeda added that this debate is essential for the country to know that there are still congressional relations with the paramilitaries.
"There is need for political control to elucidate how and to whom head, is a continuation of the para-politics in the Colombian Congress," said Cepeda.
The debate, which will be held on Wednesday 23 March in Boyacá Hall of the Capitol, will be referred to the Ministers of Interior and Justice Germain Vargas Lleras and Defense Rodrigo Rivera.
The plenary of the House of Representatives approved a proposal from representatives Guillermo Rivera, Liberal Party, and Iván Cepeda Castro del Polo Democrático, to carry out a control debate policy on allegations of false demobilization of armed groups, and on the continuation of paramilitary activity in the country and parapolitics within Congress.
For the representative Ivan Cepeda, the paramilitaries in Colombia is still alive and strengthened in the groups that the government has called BACRIM criminal gangs, or emerging bands.
"A paramilitary structures that exist today in many parts of Colombia did not can be treated like a common criminal gangs simple," said Cepeda.
According to the congressman, the State does not deny the victims the money for repair, while the treasury has squandered on false demobilizations.
"While the government cheapens the cost of victims law, the country wondered how much it has cost the state demobilization and reintegration false," he said.
Iván Cepeda added that this debate is essential for the country to know that there are still congressional relations with the paramilitaries.
"There is need for political control to elucidate how and to whom head, is a continuation of the para-politics in the Colombian Congress," said Cepeda.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Hugo Boss Theme Music
FACES TRIAL IN JOSE MIGUEL NARVAEZ [HQ] of (video) David García
PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 9, 2011
JOSE MIGUEL NARVAEZ WAS MARKED BY SEVERAL HEADS OF AUC AS "organic member" of the paramilitary structures
IVAN CEPEDA
PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 9, 2011
JOSE MIGUEL NARVAEZ WAS MARKED BY SEVERAL HEADS OF AUC AS "organic member" of the paramilitary structures
A Cool Fact About Tay-sachs
IVAN CEPEDA FACES TRIAL IN JOSE MIGUEL NARVAEZ [HQ] from (video) David Garcia
FACES IN TRIAL OF FORMER DEPUTY DAS, José Miguel Narváez, WHO WAS APPOINTED BY OTHER HEADS OF HOW AUC " organic member "of the paramilitary structures
FACES IN TRIAL OF FORMER DEPUTY DAS, José Miguel Narváez, WHO WAS APPOINTED BY OTHER HEADS OF HOW AUC " organic member "of the paramilitary structures
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Bloons Iphone Pack 3 Level 45 Walkthrough
REPRESENTATIVE IVAN CEPEDA, aka "Don Berna" SAYS JOSÉ MIGUEL NARVAEZ ERA organic members of the paramilitary
Monday, March 7, 2011
Whats The Best Types Of Protein For A Footballer
CELEBRATING A CENTURY OF INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY IVAN CEPEDA
March 8, 2011
March 8, 2011
In the first century to commemorate the international day of women, I pay a tribute to women with persistent, have sought to transform any kind of subordination against and against society. Daily work to dignify every one of the spaces that women inhabit, from the public square to the inside of their homes.
Thanks to them, Colombia now enjoys multiple standards that recognize the equality of men and women is becoming increasingly unfair tolerate any violence against him, the young women in our country have been able to diversify their livelihood options beyond motherhood and raising children, and the exercise of sexuality has been redefined to be separated from reproduction.
Today I want to give special recognition to human rights defenders and leaders of organizations of victims who in adverse situations, stubbornly defend their rights, their families and communities, dreaming of the possibilities of building a more just society.
As a member of the community of advocates and human rights defenders I reaffirm the defense of universal principles of equality, non discrimination and profound respect for differences. As a member of a leftist party that is inclusive and democratic states will persist in the elimination of all forms of discrimination and exploitation against women, central to our work. Iván Cepeda Castro
House Representative Friday, March 4, 2011
How To Install A Front License Plate On A Bmw
REPRESENTATIVE REQUESTS RESPONSE TO DR. Alejandro Ordoñez Maldonado, RELATING TO DECISIONS BY THE ATTORNEY IVAN CEPEDA
Bogotá DC, March 4, 2011. Doctor
Bogotá DC, March 4, 2011. Doctor
Ordóñez Alejandro Maldonado
Attorney General's Office City
Ref: Right to petition.
Mr. Attorney:
In a letter on 1 March 2011th member of the Ethics Committee of the Polo Democrático Alternativo, I noted my concern about the turn could be taking more of the research and decisions by his office. Within these processes has expressed growing concern over his statements or actions that would demonstrate his open inclination to prejudge, to that without knowing the arguments defense of the accused or the content of the files you transmit to the public the feeling that they have taken decisions. It has also caused concern in his conduct some warn the trend to expand the role of disciplinary control and take to the field of criminal trial.
Such debates have arisen, for example, in the case of former Senator Piedad Córdoba, Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo, the former comptroller of Bogota Miguel Angel Moralesrussi, former representative Germain Olano, and Senator Iván Moreno Rojas . Qualified lawyers have stated his opinion on these situations through opinion columns in newspapers national. Yesid criminal lawyer Alvarado Reyes said in the newspaper El Espectador: "In recent days the country has continued the hearing that is underway in the Office of the so-called carousel recruitment in Bogotá. As we perceive is being processed by officials about the commission of serious crimes, one must ask if the Attorney the body responsible for investigating and punishing them, or whether to allow the prosecution to deal with it. Allow the two entities are ordered separately who runs a behavior contrary to the criminal law is to violate Article 29 of the Constitution, which prohibits trying a person twice for the same done. Faced with this criticism is usually respond that the essence of disciplinary activity is different to the criminal and the type of sanctions to be imposed is different. However, the constitutional ban permits no exception or by the nature of the proceedings or for the quality of the sentence, except for review actions, no one can be tried twice for the same conduct. "
In the same vein, in his column for the newspaper El Espectador, Prof. Rodolfo Arango said: "However well intentioned the disciplinary action against public corruption and in defense of administrative morality, dismissal based on the alleged commission of crimes part of the sanctioned know the rule of law and fundamental rights of the accused. The only competent authorities to establish whether Germain Olano, Miguel Angel Moreno brothers Moralesrussi or committed crimes, that is the basis for disciplinary action, judges of the Republic, following the investigation and prosecution of the Attorney General's Office. This is not a mere formality. What is at stake is the existence of the rule of law. "
Colombia
While there is no immunity for any public officer, the authorities of the supervisory bodies are on duty to ensure the presumption of innocence and due process. Lord
Attorney:
Because of the deep concerns regarding the form and content of decisions made by his office in the processes mentioned above, and in exercise of my function of political control, I would respectfully ask you to supply answer following questions:
1. What legal basis, constitutional and legal, have provided support to consider certain criminal conduct, which have not been judicially established as grounds for disciplinary offenses that motivate the investigation or punishment of public servants referred to in this right of petition ?
2. What current standing of the officials being investigated or sanctioned by his office in the event that subsequent to its decision, a court's exoneration of criminal responsibility for crimes for which you derive the disciplinary? If so, in what situation would the role of disciplinary control exercised in the cases mentioned in this paper?
Sincerely,
Iván Cepeda Castro
House Representative
PS. Receive a response in the Carrera 7 No. 8-68, Office 416.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
20 Mm Phosphate Buffer Ph 7
CRITICAL POINTS FOR THE THIRD DEBATE PRESENTATION OF BILL OF VICTIMS
March 1, 2011
Representative to the House places on record Iván Cepeda about the danger of 5 points on the initiative. If not modified would refuse the rights of victims.
1. Be recognized as victims only those persons who suffered violation of their rights from 1986 and the plunder case of those who were victimazados after 1991. Be excluded as well, over 9,000 people and would no longer restore more than one hundred thousand hectares of land.
2. To the victims of dispossession and forced abandonment be denied the physical delivery of the land and return in exchange for an income, with priority to beneficiaries of the dispossession.
3. Be unknown the foundation and nature of remedial measures, since it would take measures to assist repair and humanitarian aid.
4. The bill would miss the fundamental character of the right to compensation by submitting the effective enforcement of the law of the State budgetary reasons.
5. Unrecognized foundation repair, which lies in the responsibility of the State.
Before the presentation of the paper for third reading of victims' bill, the House Representative for Bogota Iván Cepeda Castro ruled against this bill, "there are five issues of particular gravity that contains the paper, the not be changed which would involve the denial of the rights of victims, for that reason I put in the public knowledge of the speakers and the government one by one the five points. During the presentation of this bill and prior to it, I have stressed the social and political relevance of the adoption of a law guaranteeing the rights of victims, however, can not support an initiative that language under repair persists in denying the right to reparation, in the interests of the beneficiaries of the dispossession and excludes a significant section of those have actually been victimized "
The text of this project was filed today by the speakers of Senate Committee I, for third debate. Alternative Democratic Pole will do everything possible to remedy the problems presented by this initiative.
Then develop each of the five problems mentioned above:
1. Negation of the principle of universality and promotion of a revisionist reading of history
The bill defining the universe of victims, which restricts people victimized since 1986, a situation that is worse for the victims of dispossession and neglect compulsion, for only recognize those who suffered the violation of their rights since 1991. Delimitation
contravention of the principle of universality, and causes an effect revisionist memory of the country. By ignoring the existence of victims prior to 1986 was symbolically removed the origins of political violence that exists today, negating facts so important to the history as: the genocide of the Patriotic Union, the taking and retaking of the Palace of Justice and the founding of paramilitary massacres.
In quantitative terms, according to the database "Colombia Never Again", an initiative made up of NGOs, at least 8,959 people were victimized between 1966 to 1985 by state agents and paramilitary forces would be excluded, and where dispossession under with data from the Monitoring Committee to the Public Policy Forced Displacement, at least 102,403 ha. stripped land from 1980 to 1985 remain in the hands of his remains.
2. Denial of material restitution of land, the return and the right to restitution of
Regarding restitution, the text introduces Article 102 of the surface rights over the land or land subject to restitution or formalization which are established farming systems, livestock, forestry or agroforestry and / or processing plants and processing of raw materials.
His owner (the Fund Unit Stripped Land Restitution, or the opposition in good faith that have established production systems) would have the right to use, enjoy and dispose of production systems, including plantations and / or buildings that have risen above the property returned or executed by a certain time, appropriating the benefits and products they generate, from paying the stripped (bare owner) or fee income, and deliver the property upon completion of the term or condition, together with the buildings and plantations have been established on it.
to include this provision would be committing three errors by the legislature: 1. Be unknown to the restitution law, 2. Would act against property rights as fundamental rights in the case of victims of dispossession and forced abandonment, which is linked to other rights, such as food, housing and decent life, and 3. Since the state would favor big business beneficiaries of the dispossession, who maintained their production systems, and thus would prevent the return of good material and the return of the population, thus strengthening the deterritorialization of the peasantry.
in addition to restitution, the Senate continues to deny the right to restitution housing and property contained in the international principles on the matter 1, which are part of the Colombian legal system, since, as reiterated by the Constitutional Court "are part of the block of constitutionality, by virtue of Article 93 of the Constitution. "
The restitution of housing, land and heritage is a matter of justice. The victims of dispossession and neglect have not only lost their land. According to the Monitoring Committee for Public Policy on Forced Displacement, "83% of IDPs registered in the Registry of Displaced Population (RUPD) lost a well (excluding home furnishings): 72% animals, machinery and equipment 50%, 42% land, 32% crops, 24% production infrastructure and 19% non-rural real estate. Similarly, 78% of the population registered in the RUPD lost some good in 63% animals, machinery and equipment 45%, 36% land, permanent crops 23%, 17% real estate and non-rural 16% productive infrastructure "2
2. Confusion
measures
The bill ignores the difference that must exist between the measures of reparation, assistance and humanitarian aid, which have the nature, source and goals. Remedial measures are taken as assistance measures (credit, liabilities and housing allowance) and is devoted humanitarian law 418 of 1997 as administrative compensation. In practice, this situation would lead to the absurd claim that the victim has received a housing allowance-measure that can access the so-called vulnerable populations, has already been repaired.
3. Fiscal Sustainability
The Congress discusses the legislation whereby amending sections 334, 339 and 346 of the Constitution, which hopes to raise to constitutional status fiscal sustainability as a principle, holding the actions of all branches of government to this end. Legislative act in our consideration is unconstitutional as tending towards replacing the constitution, redefining the scope and meaning itself of the rule of law. Would alter the system of protection of fundamental rights, it would imply that the acts and actions planned should be back in the state's resources to any project or decision which affects the national budget.
In this sense the bill subject compliance with the standard fiscal sustainability, which means to depend on the effective enforcement of budgetary reasons, even forgetting the fundamental nature of the right to redress, rights that are mandatory and immediate compliance to the Colombian State.
4. Grounds for denial of compensation: State responsibility
eludes Bill set out the basis for the repair, and in a manner contrary reiterates the lack of any responsibility by the State.
According to international law of human rights the State must compensate the victims for two reasons, when the state is directly responsible for violations committed either by act or omission, that is, when defaults on its obligation respect, establishing a limit of their actions, and second, because of its duty as guarantor, which implies government conduct to ensure the prevention, investigation, punishment and reparation for the violations.
While recognition of the remedial measures recognized in the law does not mean a recognition of the responsibility of State agents for a single unlawful damage, the Colombian State must accept its share of responsibility in human rights violations have occurred in the country. And their responsibility for violations committed by private persons when the State failed to comply with the duty of guarantee.
deny the responsibility of the State, is ethically, morally, politically and legally reprehensible. A first step to reconciliation is to accept that in Colombia, human rights violations have been serious, massive and systematic, and that therefore the State must compensate on the basis of non-compliance with their obligations to protect, respect and security.
Angelino Garzón Vice President in his address to the Human Rights Council United Nations yesterday in relation to bill victims for restitution of land and said: "The presentation of this Act unambiguously reflects the political will national government to give higher priority to the victims and punish the perpetrators. Only in this way can we move towards a path of forgiveness and reconciliation with the prospect of peace. " It is therefore necessary that the political will is translated in driving the adoption of concrete measures to ensure the effective return of land and retention of those who are restored to their territories and of reparation measures proportionate to the harm suffered.
The representative Ivan Cepeda and the Polo Democrático Alternativo, continue to insist on a bill to set international standards on the subject and the demands of the victims.
More information: Ana Jimena Bautista
Office Revelo R. Ivan Cepeda Castro
Cel: 3154637817
March 1, 2011
Representative to the House places on record Iván Cepeda about the danger of 5 points on the initiative. If not modified would refuse the rights of victims.
1. Be recognized as victims only those persons who suffered violation of their rights from 1986 and the plunder case of those who were victimazados after 1991. Be excluded as well, over 9,000 people and would no longer restore more than one hundred thousand hectares of land.
2. To the victims of dispossession and forced abandonment be denied the physical delivery of the land and return in exchange for an income, with priority to beneficiaries of the dispossession.
3. Be unknown the foundation and nature of remedial measures, since it would take measures to assist repair and humanitarian aid.
4. The bill would miss the fundamental character of the right to compensation by submitting the effective enforcement of the law of the State budgetary reasons.
5. Unrecognized foundation repair, which lies in the responsibility of the State.
Before the presentation of the paper for third reading of victims' bill, the House Representative for Bogota Iván Cepeda Castro ruled against this bill, "there are five issues of particular gravity that contains the paper, the not be changed which would involve the denial of the rights of victims, for that reason I put in the public knowledge of the speakers and the government one by one the five points. During the presentation of this bill and prior to it, I have stressed the social and political relevance of the adoption of a law guaranteeing the rights of victims, however, can not support an initiative that language under repair persists in denying the right to reparation, in the interests of the beneficiaries of the dispossession and excludes a significant section of those have actually been victimized "
The text of this project was filed today by the speakers of Senate Committee I, for third debate. Alternative Democratic Pole will do everything possible to remedy the problems presented by this initiative.
1. Negation of the principle of universality and promotion of a revisionist reading of history
The bill defining the universe of victims, which restricts people victimized since 1986, a situation that is worse for the victims of dispossession and neglect compulsion, for only recognize those who suffered the violation of their rights since 1991. Delimitation
contravention of the principle of universality, and causes an effect revisionist memory of the country. By ignoring the existence of victims prior to 1986 was symbolically removed the origins of political violence that exists today, negating facts so important to the history as: the genocide of the Patriotic Union, the taking and retaking of the Palace of Justice and the founding of paramilitary massacres.
In quantitative terms, according to the database "Colombia Never Again", an initiative made up of NGOs, at least 8,959 people were victimized between 1966 to 1985 by state agents and paramilitary forces would be excluded, and where dispossession under with data from the Monitoring Committee to the Public Policy Forced Displacement, at least 102,403 ha. stripped land from 1980 to 1985 remain in the hands of his remains.
2. Denial of material restitution of land, the return and the right to restitution of
Regarding restitution, the text introduces Article 102 of the surface rights over the land or land subject to restitution or formalization which are established farming systems, livestock, forestry or agroforestry and / or processing plants and processing of raw materials.
His owner (the Fund Unit Stripped Land Restitution, or the opposition in good faith that have established production systems) would have the right to use, enjoy and dispose of production systems, including plantations and / or buildings that have risen above the property returned or executed by a certain time, appropriating the benefits and products they generate, from paying the stripped (bare owner) or fee income, and deliver the property upon completion of the term or condition, together with the buildings and plantations have been established on it.
to include this provision would be committing three errors by the legislature: 1. Be unknown to the restitution law, 2. Would act against property rights as fundamental rights in the case of victims of dispossession and forced abandonment, which is linked to other rights, such as food, housing and decent life, and 3. Since the state would favor big business beneficiaries of the dispossession, who maintained their production systems, and thus would prevent the return of good material and the return of the population, thus strengthening the deterritorialization of the peasantry.
in addition to restitution, the Senate continues to deny the right to restitution housing and property contained in the international principles on the matter 1, which are part of the Colombian legal system, since, as reiterated by the Constitutional Court "are part of the block of constitutionality, by virtue of Article 93 of the Constitution. "
The restitution of housing, land and heritage is a matter of justice. The victims of dispossession and neglect have not only lost their land. According to the Monitoring Committee for Public Policy on Forced Displacement, "83% of IDPs registered in the Registry of Displaced Population (RUPD) lost a well (excluding home furnishings): 72% animals, machinery and equipment 50%, 42% land, 32% crops, 24% production infrastructure and 19% non-rural real estate. Similarly, 78% of the population registered in the RUPD lost some good in 63% animals, machinery and equipment 45%, 36% land, permanent crops 23%, 17% real estate and non-rural 16% productive infrastructure "2
2. Confusion
measures
The bill ignores the difference that must exist between the measures of reparation, assistance and humanitarian aid, which have the nature, source and goals. Remedial measures are taken as assistance measures (credit, liabilities and housing allowance) and is devoted humanitarian law 418 of 1997 as administrative compensation. In practice, this situation would lead to the absurd claim that the victim has received a housing allowance-measure that can access the so-called vulnerable populations, has already been repaired.
3. Fiscal Sustainability
The Congress discusses the legislation whereby amending sections 334, 339 and 346 of the Constitution, which hopes to raise to constitutional status fiscal sustainability as a principle, holding the actions of all branches of government to this end. Legislative act in our consideration is unconstitutional as tending towards replacing the constitution, redefining the scope and meaning itself of the rule of law. Would alter the system of protection of fundamental rights, it would imply that the acts and actions planned should be back in the state's resources to any project or decision which affects the national budget.
In this sense the bill subject compliance with the standard fiscal sustainability, which means to depend on the effective enforcement of budgetary reasons, even forgetting the fundamental nature of the right to redress, rights that are mandatory and immediate compliance to the Colombian State.
4. Grounds for denial of compensation: State responsibility
eludes Bill set out the basis for the repair, and in a manner contrary reiterates the lack of any responsibility by the State.
According to international law of human rights the State must compensate the victims for two reasons, when the state is directly responsible for violations committed either by act or omission, that is, when defaults on its obligation respect, establishing a limit of their actions, and second, because of its duty as guarantor, which implies government conduct to ensure the prevention, investigation, punishment and reparation for the violations.
While recognition of the remedial measures recognized in the law does not mean a recognition of the responsibility of State agents for a single unlawful damage, the Colombian State must accept its share of responsibility in human rights violations have occurred in the country. And their responsibility for violations committed by private persons when the State failed to comply with the duty of guarantee.
deny the responsibility of the State, is ethically, morally, politically and legally reprehensible. A first step to reconciliation is to accept that in Colombia, human rights violations have been serious, massive and systematic, and that therefore the State must compensate on the basis of non-compliance with their obligations to protect, respect and security.
Angelino Garzón Vice President in his address to the Human Rights Council United Nations yesterday in relation to bill victims for restitution of land and said: "The presentation of this Act unambiguously reflects the political will national government to give higher priority to the victims and punish the perpetrators. Only in this way can we move towards a path of forgiveness and reconciliation with the prospect of peace. " It is therefore necessary that the political will is translated in driving the adoption of concrete measures to ensure the effective return of land and retention of those who are restored to their territories and of reparation measures proportionate to the harm suffered.
The representative Ivan Cepeda and the Polo Democrático Alternativo, continue to insist on a bill to set international standards on the subject and the demands of the victims.
More information: Ana Jimena Bautista
Office Revelo R. Ivan Cepeda Castro
Cel: 3154637817
Free Ohio Drivers License Template
suspension request of Senator Ivan Moreno Rojas Iván Cepeda Castro presented and the group Let's Rights IVAN CEPEDA
Bogotá DC, 1 March 2011
Ladies and gentlemen
ETHICS COMMISSION City Alternative Democratic Pole
Re: Request for suspension of Senator Iván Moreno Rojas
appreciated and valued companions companions
respectfully ask you to stay in their functions, duties and assignments as a member of the Alternative Democratic Pole Senator Iván Moreno Rojas, in relation to the decision of the Attorney General's Office to file charges by alleged involvement in acts of corruption. This is according to the provisions of the Statute, Article 10 - and Article 25 of the Code of Ethics of the Party.
Sincerely,
Iván Cepeda Castro
House Representative for the Alternative Democratic Pole
GO FOR COLLECTIVE RIGHTS
Bogotá DC, 1 March 2011
Ladies and gentlemen
ETHICS COMMISSION City Alternative Democratic Pole
Re: Request for suspension of Senator Iván Moreno Rojas
appreciated and valued companions companions
respectfully ask you to stay in their functions, duties and assignments as a member of the Alternative Democratic Pole Senator Iván Moreno Rojas, in relation to the decision of the Attorney General's Office to file charges by alleged involvement in acts of corruption. This is according to the provisions of the Statute, Article 10 - and Article 25 of the Code of Ethics of the Party.
This request is made sure that whatever the outcome of the judicial and disciplinary actions taken by the competent authorities, the Polo Democrático must make decisions now that will allow security to safeguard the public and its right preventive ethical action. Given the high dignitaries who holds the senator Moreno Rojas, both on the national stage as well as internally, the temporary removal of the Party must provide transparency in the course of the process and until such time that the competent state bodies In making their decisions.
In this sense, the ethical measure to apply under any circumstances does not imply an act of prejudgment. Claim for Senator Moreno Rojas full respect for the presumption of innocence and due process.
Finally, I express the concern that I am overcome by the remarkable shift that has been taking various decisions of the Attorney General's Office to extend its control function and bring your field disciplinary action criminal, which is a function of other judicial authorities. Sincerely,
Iván Cepeda Castro
House Representative for the Alternative Democratic Pole
GO FOR COLLECTIVE RIGHTS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)